From lawrence.auster em att.net Fri Jan 2 10:46:01 2009 From: lawrence.auster em att.net (Lawrence Auster) Date: Fri Jan 2 10:46:05 2009 Subject: [Gesac. AC] Commentary Message-ID: <20090102124559.IYXP2682.hrndva-omta06.mail.rr.com@2ao1z> Some comments about the recent post on the Zionist and obsessively anti-Arab, anti-Islam, The Brussels Journal ( http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3716 ). In case the reader wants to see what is real, crazed hate directed at an identifiable group and religion, I would advise him or her to spend some time on the The Brussels Journal Web site; after seeing so much excrement, however, the reader will probably feel the urge to take a long shower. '''The comedian and professional anti-Semite Dieudonne M’Bala M’Bala (left), who is currently performing at the Zenith Theatre in Paris, invited onto the stage to join him one Robert Faurisson, noted French Holocaust denier. This happened while Jean-Marie Le Pen was in the audience.''' If Dieudonne is a ''professional anti-Semite'' then you’re a professional anti-Arabist, Tiberge. You see, several can play that game. Robert Faurisson is not a ''Holocaust denier'' (typical stupid name-calling in the Zionist-controlled media); rather, he’s a revisionist (see the Faurisson archive in French here and English here ) (As Robert Faurisson said: ''A reminder: Revisionists do not deny the genocide and the gas chambers. That is a misconception. Galileo didn’t deny that the earth was stationary; he affirmed, at the conclusion of his research, that the earth was not stationary, but that it rotated on its axis and revolved around the sun. In the same way, the revisionists, after concluding their own research, affirm that there was no genocide and no gas chambers, and that the ''final solution of the Jewish question'' consisted of the removal of the Jews from Europe — by emigration if possible, and by deportation if necessary. The revisionists strive to establish what happend; they are positive, while the exterminationists doggedly continue to tell us about things which didn’t happen: their work is negative. The revisionists stand for the reconciliation of the antagonists in the recognition of what really happened. ''If this doesn’t bring the Front National to an end, nothing will. I would almost venture to guess that Le Pen is doing this deliberately to sink his party so that no one, not even his daughter Marine, will ever take the reins of what he must consider his own private possession.'' Here, the author (inadvertently?) gives a lot of power to French Jewry if merely being in the audience while Robert Faurisson came on stage is enough ''to sink'' Jean-Marie Le Pen’s party. If this is not guilt by association in its most totalitarian form I don’t know what is. It’s like saying that because one was in the audience while Fidel Castro was given a medal that one must be a communist sympathizer. To my knowledge, Jean-Marie Le Pen has never commented on Robert Faurisson or his revisionist work. '' Such an event must be regarded in several different ways, simultaneously. First, Dieudonne derives intense pleasure from throwing the sh.. on the fan. He has learned that Jew-hatred is a thriving industry, that he attracts a public who calls him their hero, that he opens old wounds, and that, through the ruse of claiming he has been denied his right of freedom of speech, he wins support among people who are opposed to France’s laws against Holocaust denial.'' What chuzpah! It’s the Arab and Muslim communities that are the victims of constant harassment and discrimination. The Brussels Journal proves it on a daily basis that Arab and Muslim hatred is ''a thriving industry'' in France (and Belgium). Let’s compare the amount of hatred the Arab and Muslim communities face in France to that allegedly faced by the government-protected French Jewry and its plethora of institutions, movements, groups, lobbies, leagues, organizations, etc., etc., etc. And its direct access to the highest spheres of French government and virtually total domination of French media and the entertainment industry. Hell, one of their fellow members of the Tribe is the French president! Arabs and Muslims can only dream of having this much power and influence! Further, is the author saying that the Jews didn’t lobby to obtain this special law to protect the so-called Holocaust from free inquiry and independent research and doubt? That they’re somehow the real victims of such a law? The poor dears... they’re the ones going to jail and/or paying hefty fines....I forgot.... There’s no free speech insofar as the Holocaust is concerned. Where’s the ''ruse'', Tiberge, you lying sack of shit! Additionally, violent Jewish organization operate with total impunity in France and elsewhere in the Jew-controlled West (see here and here), while Muslims are under constant scrutiny. ''The trouble is: these laws are very much part of the problem. You cannot privilege one group by mandating that it is a crime punishable by fines and prison terms to deny the evil that was done to them.'' Stop your crocodile tears, Tiberge! you don’t have a problem with the Gayssot-Fabius statute (see here), what bothers you is that other minorities, taking their cues from French Jewry, also seek to legally protect their version of history and status as victims from prying eyes! ''Such laws are no different from affirmative action laws, and laws against all forms of discrimination such as those passed by the European Union. They create precisely the opposite of what they are supposed to do, i.e., they create hatred of the privileged party, they throw together into the same pot various social problems, ideas, and historical facts that should be kept separate and treated differently, because they are different. For example, anti-Semitism and hostility towards massive immigration not the same thing. They are not the same hostility. But the great equalizing machine that is Sarkozy’s government must make ALL hostilities seem equally bad, because he is unable to make distinctions between them. To do so would be to admit that the huge population of people who are not white, Christian and European are not necessarily all equal. He must prove that they are, in fact, all equally, victims of the evil white Christian European. Second, by having Le Pen in the audience, it is the ENTIRE patriotic movement, the entire effort to save France that is discredited. Le Pen is not discredited -- he DOESNT CARE!!! There is no need to concern ourselves with HIS image, but rather with the image and ultimate fate of the movement of which he claims to be a part, but of which he is not (and apparently never has been) anything but an impostor.'' Right…Jean-Marie Le Pen lost an eye and almost his life (for example, the building where his Parisian apartment was located was bombed here. The perpetrators have never been brought to justice in France. Prior to that event, and following it, he’s been the victim of countless death threats and physical assaults) defending the ethnic genetic interests of autocthonous French men and women. His entire adult life has been but a long struggle against the immigration-invasion of France. A struggle that has cost him dearly but ''he DOESN’T CARE'' according to Tiberge. Who are you, Tiberge, you keyboard warrior? You’re unfit to shine his shoes. What have you done in comparison aside from fellating French Jews and calumniating the Arab world? And you dare to call Jean-Marie Le Pen an ''impostor''? Fuck you, Tiberge! ''Third, this gives racist-hunters like Nicolas Sarkozy grist for their mill. Dedicated as he is to ridding French soil of all racism, he and his ministers will point to Dieudonne’s provocation as a shameful, inadmissible, unacceptable, act of racism that has no place in France. This will serve his purpose very well and will furnish him with an infallible pretext for sending HALDE or MRAP or whatever anti-racist organizations he chooses to track down every measly Holocaust denier he can ferret out.'' Cry me a river, Tiberge, you lying hypocrite! You mention HALDE and MRAP (you could mention many more such organizations with a thoroughly kosher background), who founded these anti-French organizations? Who funds them today? A hint: it wasn’t, and it isn’t, Arabs. It’s precisely those Jewish front institutions (the French equivalent of SPLC and ADL) who maintain the immigrationist status quo in France by threatening the income and social status of dissident whites and their organizations. '' The media will have a field day pointing to the evils of the ''extreme Right'', due to Le Pen’s presence, even though, according to the French blogger Francois Desouche anyway, Faurisson is a left-winger. (Note: The websites regard Faurisson as a right-winger. According to Wikipedia, he claims to be apolitical.)'' What Tiberge doesn’t seem to understand is that Robert Faurisson doens’t have a political agenda and no discernable politics. He’s a fearless idealist and truth-seeker, no matter the personal and professional consequences; and that’s something opportunists and paid calumniators like Tiberge can never comprehend as they aren’t made of the same ''material.'' This is a man who has made, and continues to make, tremendous personal sacrifices in the quaint pursuit of historical truth. ''The Jews of France will probably not understand the complexities of this situation, choosing to see only the anti-Semitism of the ''extreme Right'', blind to the insidious way their history is being manipulated and exploited for the purpose of intimidating, terrorizing, and mongrelizing the French people. Blind, too, to the dangers they will confront if they don’t rethink their own instinctual reaction of identifying more closely with non-assimilable immigrants than with French patriots, of preferring to side with the Left or with Sarko’s false Right than with authentic nationalists and traditionalists. This is a problem they have, but they are certainly not alone; and when one sees the ways in which the waters are muddied by celebrity policy-makers such as Dieudonne, and public opinion formed by relentless government propaganda, not to mention the inferior education being offered today, it is not surprising that things have reached this level of inextricability.'' Tiberge, like her cowardly and lying ilk, prefers to attack the symptoms rather the causes. Hey, Tiberge, tell us who maniacally pressured for decades the French government in favor of open borders, greater immigration, and multiculturalism/multiracialism, until Arabs and Africans started burning their synagogues? Was it Saudi Arabia? Was it Iran? Was it Arabs or another group of Semites? Tell us, Tiberge! Who? Hint: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JynsGnCESe8&eurl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2neyEXIBesk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySR6N-Fy-EM What the lobby did for Europe, it also did for America (see here). Nothing new under the sun. The Jewish hostility towards western civilization is well-known and documented. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vfbe81isw0Q ''This incident itself hopefully will pass quickly into oblivion, its principal actors as well, but the processes described above will go on, until France gets a worthy leader, which will not be, as far as anyone can tell, in the near future.'' Hopefully not. To the chagrin of the lying paid Zionist whore, the odds are that the event only signals an increase in the scale of the slave revolt. ''Francois Desouche had to close comments for the post because of the legal considerations I alluded to. Some of his readers must have defended Dieudonn?’s right to express himself freely about the Holocaust. However to post such comments places Desouche in a vulnerable position where his website could be shut down for violating French laws. This is what I mean when I say these laws are not doing anybody, except the ''thought police'', any good.'' Intellectual terror at its worse. Who’s responsible for this thought police, Tiberge? ''The post includes a video of Dieudonne on stage. French readers may have an easier time than I did understanding it. There are various versions of the video all over the French blogosphere. This one is more audible and shows the arrival of Faurisson on the stage as Dieudonn? energetically encourages the audience to applaud. An aura of weird ritual emanates from the entire scene as this old man justifies himself to an audience of primarily young people, most of whom (one assumes) have no idea who he is. It’s all very creepy.'' So Tiberge’s worthless drivel concerns a video she’s unable to understand. You can rest assured, Tiberge, that everyone in the audience knew who Robert Faurisson was. They didn’t need any encouragement to applaud a brave freedom fighter when they saw one in front of them. As an aside, and before pronouncing judgment on Robert Faurisson, tell us , Tiberge, which of his revisionist writings have you read.I thought so FUCK YOU, TIBERGE, YOU LYING ZIONIST WHORE! The Brussels Journal is part of the false opposition to the West’s predicament. ----- Lawrence Auster, 1300 Wilson Blvd, Ste 120 Arlington, VA 22209-2312 From lawrence.auster em att.net Sun Jan 4 08:55:24 2009 From: lawrence.auster em att.net (Lawrence Auster) Date: Sun Jan 4 08:55:37 2009 Subject: [Gesac. AC] The Vampire Race Now Sucking This Country Dry Message-ID: <20090104105521.QPTO2036.cdptpa-omta06.mail.rr.com@5rpet> From lawrence.auster em att.net Mon Jan 5 10:30:58 2009 From: lawrence.auster em att.net (Lawrence Auster) Date: Mon Jan 5 10:30:58 2009 Subject: [Gesac. AC] Pedophilia 'Rampant' in Orthodox Judaism Message-ID: <20090105123054.LUAD24032.hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com@9elei> From antivirus em idbrasil.org.br Tue Jan 6 12:20:12 2009 From: antivirus em idbrasil.org.br (Virus Scanner) Date: Tue Jan 6 12:21:48 2009 Subject: [Gesac. AC] AVISO: Email rejeitado: VIRUS Detectado Message-ID: <20090106142012.9A7E0E0DE114@gid15.idbrasil.org.br> Seu email para (adm4u133503@cyrus) com assunto ( Re: solCaderno) foi rejeitado por conter virus. Virus encontrados: Worm.Somefool.AR FOUND From lawrence.auster em att.net Wed Jan 7 12:13:07 2009 From: lawrence.auster em att.net (Lawrence Auster) Date: Wed Jan 7 12:13:06 2009 Subject: [Gesac. AC] CHRISTIAN JEWS ARRESTED, PERSECUTED IN ISRAEL Message-ID: <20090107141303.XSTC6232.hrndva-omta01.mail.rr.com@3lyw4> CHRISTIAN JEWS ARRESTED, PERSECUTED IN ISRAEL By Rev. Ted Pike Dec 08 The state of Israel says “GO HOME!” to Christian Jews who want to become citizens or to live as authentic, Holy Spirit-led believers in Israel. Israel prohibits Christian Jews from becoming citizens. It also forbids any Christian—whether Jew or Gentile—from sharing Christianity with a minor or even buying an adult Jew a cup of coffee in the course of their religious discussion! In Israel’s latest act of official anti-Christianity, a Messianic Jewish couple was arrested and detained for over eight hours—in what the husband described as a “particularly dirty, smelly and overcrowded” detention facility—because of their faith. The Jerusalem Post: A director of the US Union of Messianic Jewish Congregations and his wife were detained Sunday at Ben-Gurion Airport by Interior Ministry officials amid allegations he is involved in illegal Christian missionary activity. It is illegal in Israel to proselytize among minors. It is also prohibited to engage in missionary activities among adults when economic incentives are offered… After over eight hours of detention, Jamie Cowen, a former president of the union, and his wife, Stacy, were permitted to enter Israel only after they agreed to sign a document that they would not engage in missionary activities during their stay…The Interior Ministry, which directed the police to arrest the Cowens, said they had classified information regarding missionary activity. Cowen, who is also a U.S. immigration lawyer, comments: “This type of religious discrimination would be expected of Iran, not Israel…In the US we imprison individuals suspected of terrorism. Here apparently one can be jailed for his religious convictions. This is a case of blatant discrimination against basic rights.” ("Messianic Jews detained at Ben-Gurion," The Jerusalem Post, Dec. 14, 2008) To Obey or Not Obey in Israel In the Book of Acts, apostles Peter and John were similarly detained by Jewish authorities. Like the Cowens, they were warned that if they continued to witness for Christ they would be flogged and imprisoned – a much worse fate than simply being denied entry to Israel. Unlike the Cowens, they did not agree to be silent and deny their Lord. They were subsequently flogged and imprisoned. (Acts 4, 5) They would not insult the Holy Spirit’s right to guide their actions at any time, anywhere, even in a land where it is illegal to witness for Christ. Today, the government of Israel requires any Christian who wants to live there unimprisoned to insult the Holy Spirit. That Christian must ignore God’s prompting to speak or teach. The Cowens were told to leave their freedom of speech and the Holy Spirit at the Tel Aviv airport. This is the worst moral assault on any true Christian – assault on his conscience and openness to God’s guidance. God’s Holy Spirit yearns to use the Cowens and all believers visiting Israel to help save lost Israelis, young and old. Now such souls may go to hell. For the privilege of entering the "holy land” and visiting their daughters, the Cowens, like millions of visiting evangelicals every year, agreed to Israel’s anti-Christ terms of silence. Colossal Ingratitude Ironically, the Cowens aren’t even racists or political subversives! Hardly. They are dedicated backers of Israel with an impressive record of support for Jewish charities. “Cowen said he had visited Israel about 10 times, and had been active in social causes via the Knesset Social Lobby. ‘I’ve brought $100,000 in humanitarian aid to Israel. We’ve provided lone IDF soldiers with about $50,000 in aid.’ Of the slap in the face which Israel gave him for his altruism, Cowen says, ‘This is unbelievable.’” The US Union of Messianic Jewish Congregations, over which Cowen formerly presided, “has 90 member congregations with membership ranging between 50 and 400 per congregation . . .” The government of Israel understands Cowen’s influence and that their harassment of him could send shockwaves among evangelicals. Yet the Interior Ministry, increasingly inhabited by ultra-Orthodox Jews, only cares about ending Christian evangelism in Israel, not about world opinion. The government of Israel, as well as local governing bodies, continues to silently look the other way as Messianic Jews in Israel endure continuous and increasing harassment, persecution and even violence. Official anti-Christianity is documented via many graphic video clips by the oppressed Messianics at their websites. [1] Israel’s mistreatment of the Cowens is a reminder that Israel, despite its propaganda, is not a democracy. “Calev Myers, founder and chief counsel of The Jerusalem Institute, which provides legal advice and representation to messianic Jews, said, ‘Israel is the only Western country where basic freedom of religion is denied.’” Israeli Thought Police Many evangelicals, led by “Israel-first” fanatics like Pastor John Hagee, believe (evidently like the Cowens) that tireless love, blessing, and financial gifts will soften Israel’s anti-Christianity. The behavior of the increasingly Orthodox government proves otherwise. Israel is developing into an anti-Christian police state, feeding on tips from Orthodox informers. The Post quotes anti-missionary spokesman Meyer Cohen saying the Interior Ministry now has its own intelligence unit to spy on missionaries and Messianic Jews. Calev Myers says, “anti-missionary associations such as Yad Le’achim often tipped off Interior Ministry officials regarding messianic Jews attempting to enter the country.” Israel, taking off her smiling mask, emerges as an ominous “speech crime” gestapo on the make. In the United States and through world governing bodies, the Anti-Defamation League, chief PR rep for Israel, works tirelessly to conform the rest of the world to what they view as the Israeli ideal. ADL wants to make the whole world like Israel – a place where it will become a federal crime for anyone to witness for Jesus Christ in print, on the airwaves, the internet, or just on the street corner. ADL wants Christians in heartland America, as in Israel, to face arrest and imprisonment for the “hate crime” of leading anyone to Christ. When those converted are Jews, ADL ups the ante to the crime of “anti-Semitism,” a crime against the Jewish people which conceivably could lead to deportation and imprisonment in Israel, fulfilling Christ’s prophecy (Luke 21:12). [2] Holding the Holy Land Hostage For millennia, the "holy land" has been viewed as owned by God, a place for individuals of all faiths to find inspiration, to visit or live in. Now Israel holds it hostage as if it belongs only to Talmudic Jews. The government legislates not only against Christians and Moslems but even Jews who believe in Jesus. The Post says, “The [Israeli] Supreme Court has ruled that Jews who embraced Christianity are not eligible for Israeli citizenship.” When will evangelical visitors to Israel stop caving to Israel’s demands that they not witness? When will Christians, like the apostles in Acts, resolve to speak only as the Holy Spirit leads, regardless of the price? After all, authentic Christianity is about pleasing God alone, not man. If Christians do not defy Israeli law, as did the apostles, even to the point of going to prison, Israel’s anti-Christian aggression will only increase. It’s time for Christians to do what has heretofore been unthinkable to them. Say to Israel, "We must obey God, rather than men." (Acts 5:29) Endnotes: 1. See Lura Maimon Beckford’s website at http://kingsmenarad.com/. 2. See ADL's Foxman: New Testament is Anti-Semitic at truthtellers.org, February 15, 2006. Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization. From lawrence.auster em att.net Wed Jan 7 13:14:41 2009 From: lawrence.auster em att.net (Lawrence Auster) Date: Wed Jan 7 13:14:45 2009 Subject: [Gesac. AC] The Jewish Role in Immigration Message-ID: <20090107151434.ZUYG6232.hrndva-omta01.mail.rr.com@2ao1z> Give me your tired, your huddled masses, Yearning to breathe free. The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. — Emma Lazarus The influx of Europeans into North America led the Indian populations to displacement and eventually to consignation on reservations. Similarly, relentless Jewish immigration into Palestine was against the interests of the Palestinian people, but it was necessary for the Jewish takeover of the region. It laid the foundation for the Zionist State.Any tribe, race or nation desiring to preserve its culture, group interests and sovereignty must preserve its predominant status in the geographic region in which it dwells. Most nations have had a fundamental understanding of that fact from the time of the earliest civilizations, and every modern nation has sought strict control of its borders and immigration. Most Americans view the Indian historical record of resistance to European colonization as morally justifiable, but in the skewed ethics of today, some find European-American attempts to preserve our unique genes and culture from non-European immigration - morally reprehensible. Nevertheless, despite pervasive propaganda promoting multiculturalism and the media-touted joys of diversity, opinion surveys in America show overwhelming opposition to unrestricted immigration. Similar public sentiment holds true in every European nation. It was not until the 1965 Immigration Act that the U.S. Congress ignored the majority’s wishes and began a policy that discriminated against potential European immigrants, and encouraged massive non-European immigration. From that time forward, the federal government also showed less willingness to enforce our immigration laws and police our borders. These policies resulted in a flood of non-White immigrants, legal and illegal. Immigration and higher non-White birthrates have transformed the American population from almost 90 percent European in the early 1960s to less than 70 percent at the end of the century. The U.S. Census Bureau has predicted that by the middle of the 21st century, well within the lifetime of many reading these words, European Americans will be a minority in the United States. We are already a minority in most of America’s major cities and will soon be outnumbered in California and Texas. Policies similar to those enacted in the U.S. have introduced large numbers of non-Europeans into Canada; Negroes into Britain; North Africans and Asians into France; Turks into Germany; and a potpourri of alien races into Scandinavia, Spain, and Italy. As I grew racially aware, it was certainly obvious to me that the new immigration policies of the United States and Europe would greatly damage Western societies. Only a short time after the change in immigration policy, crime problems escalated in all the affected nations. The quality of education suffered and social welfare problems increased. As this planned racial transformation accelerates, these ills will reach catastrophic proportions. What groups had anything to gain from this demographic Armageddon? The individual foreigners who could benefit from the economic opportunities afforded by the Western societies had little political or economic clout while outside the Western nations. As I looked into the American fight over immigration laws during the last 100 years, the driving force behind opening America’s borders became evident: It was organized Jewry, personified by the poet Emma Lazarus whose lines I quoted to begin the chapter. By the time I was a junior in high school, I had become convinced that massive non-European immigration poised the greatest short and long-term threat to the America that I loved. I saw that the Immigration Act of 1965, unless repealed, would eventually sound the death knell for my country. Much of the material I read pointed to a long history of organized Jewish efforts to radically change America’s immigration laws. I contacted Drew Smith, an elderly New Orleans attorney who had authored The Legacy of the Melting Pot, and who had already taught me a lot about the immigration issue.[869] Smith and I met one rainy day after school at the Citizens Council offices. He explained the history of American immigration law. After quoting the Lazarus lines from the base of the Statue of Liberty, he asked me, “Whose interest could have been served in having America flooded with ‘wretched refuse’?” He quickly answered his own question. “It was in the perceived interest of a cohesive people who use racial solidarity like a weapon, a weapon they want only for themselves. The efforts to change the American immigration law and ultimately displace the European majority has been led almost exclusively by Jews.” Smith explained that Emma Lazarus — like many other immigration activists — was a Jewish partisan who supported the creation of an exclusively Jewish Zionist state in Palestine, but who supported “diversity” for America. He pointed out to me how Jews such as Lazarus have even changed the modern meaning of the Statue of Liberty. The beautiful jade-colored colossus had no original connection with immigration and predated the Ellis Island immigration center. It was a gift from France to commemorate the American Revolution, not to honor the arrival of “wretched refuse” on America’s shores. It is instructive to note that this beautiful statue of European Womanhood faces not to Africa, Asia or South America, but the land where she was born, France and Europe itself. Emma Lazarus had been best known for her fulminations against Russia’s pogroms following the assassination of Czar Alexander II in 1881. The irony is rich: A Jewish supremacist dedicated to the creation of an elite Jewish State in Palestine was anxious to turn America into a refuge for the castoffs of the world. Drew Smith owned many books on the immigration issue, including some by Jews, in which he had underlined important passages. I borrowed them and passionately delved into them. Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress led (and still lead) the effort to liberalize American immigration and defeat restrictionist legislation. In 1921, 1924, and 1952, Congress passed legislation that simply attempted to maintain the racial status quo in America. Interestingly enough, even though Anglo Americans were in a vast majority of the American population as well as in Congress, they did not attempt to increase their own percentage of the American population, but simply sought to fairly maintain each group’s status quo. In the early legislative battles, Jews were the leading advocates of open immigration and vehemently opposed legislation that would maintain America as an ethnically European, Christian nation. In the House of Representatives, Adolph Sabath, Samuel Dickstein, and Emanuel Celler led the fight for unrestricted immigration, while in the Senate, Herbert Lehman and in later years Jacob Javits coordinated the effort. In the early struggles, Representative Leavitt clearly outlined the Jewish involvement in remarks before Congress. The instinct for national and race preservation is not one to be condemned…. No one should be better able to understand the desire of Americans to keep America American than the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Sabath], who is leading the attack on this measure, or the gentlemen from New York, Mr. Dickstein, Mr. Jacobstein, Mr. Celler, and Mr. Perlman. They are of the one great historic people who have maintained the identity of their race throughout the centuries because they believe sincerely that they are a chosen people, with certain ideals to maintain, and knowing that the loss of racial identity means a change of ideals. That fact should make it easy for them and the majority of the most active opponents of this measure in the spoken debate to recognize and sympathize with our viewpoint, which is not so extreme as that of their own race, but only demands that the admixture of other peoples shall be only of such kind and proportions and in such quantities as will not alter racial characteristics more rapidly than there can be assimilation as to ideas of government as well as of blood. (Congressional Record, April 12, 1924.)[870] Sociologist Edward A. Ross, in his influential 1914 book The Old World and the New: The Significance of Past and Present Immigration to the American People, quotes the famous pro-immigration leader Israel Zangwill as suggesting that America is an ideal place to achieve Jewish interests. Ross then bluntly writes about the Jewish influence. Jews therefore have a powerful interest in immigration policy: Hence the endeavor of the Jews to control the immigration policy of the United States. Although theirs is but a seventh of our net immigration, they led the fight on the Immigration Commission’s bill…. The systematic campaign in newspapers and magazines to break down all arguments for restriction and to calm nativist fears is waged by and for one race. Hebrew money is behind the National Liberal Immigration League and its numerous publications.[871] In 1924 Congressman Knud Wefald pointed out the Communist ties of many of the Jewish immigrants and stated that many Jews have no sympathy with our old-time American ideals.” The leadership of our intellectual life in many of its phases has come into the hands of these clever newcomers who have no sympathy with our old-time American ideals … who detect our weaknesses and pander to them and get wealthy through the disservices they render us. Our whole system of amusements has been taken over by men who came here on the crest of the south and east European immigration. They produce our horrible film stories [and] they write many of the books we read, and edit our magazines and newspapers. (Congressional Record, April 12, 1924.[872] The last important congressional legislation passed to protect the status quo of America was the Walter-McCarran act of 1952. Congressional opposition was led by the Jewish troika of Celler, Javits, and Lehman. Every major Jewish organization (as well as the Communist Party USA) also lined up to oppose it, including the American Jewish Congress, American Jewish Committee, the ADL, National Council of Jewish Women, and dozens of others. During congressional debate, Francis Walter noted that the only civic organization that opposed the entire bill was the American Jewish Congress. Representative Celler noted that Walter “should not have overemphasized as he did the people of one particular faith who are opposing the bills.” (Congressional Record, April 23, 1952.)[873] When Jewish Judge Simon Rifkind testified against the bill in joint hearings, he emphasized that in supporting breaking down U.S. immigration law, he represented “the entire body of religious and lay opinion within the Jewish group, religiously speaking, from the extreme right and extreme left.”[874] It thrilled me to read the courageous remarks of Mississippi Congressman John Rankin during the debate. Today such truthful comments by any elected official would bring a torrent of abuse that few could withstand. They whine about discrimination. Do you know who is being discriminated against? The white Christian people of America, the ones who created this nation…. I am talking about the white Christian people of the North as well as the South. . . . Communism is racial. A racial minority seized control in Russia and in all her satellite countries, such as Poland, Czechoslovakia and many other countries I could name. They have been run out of practically every country in Europe in the years gone by, and if they keep stirring race trouble in this country and trying to force their Communistic program on the Christian people of America, there is no telling what will happen to them here. (Congressional Record, April 23, 1952.)[875] Finally, in 1965, the goal first advanced by Jewish organizations in the 1880s came to fruition when Congress passed the Immigration Act. It has resulted in immigration becoming 90 percent non-European. America went from an immigration program meant to be proportionately representative to all groups in the United States to one that discriminated against Europeans. As with earlier legislation, Jewish representatives and senators as well as powerful Jewish lobbying organizations led the assault. It succeeded because during the 41 years since 1924, Jewish power had increased dramatically in virtually all spheres of American life. In 1951 Senator Jacob Javits authored an article called “Let’s Open Our Gates.”[876] that called for massive unrestricted immigration. Javits and Representative Celler figured prominently in the passage of the bill in 1965. Nine years before passage of the 1965 Immigration Act, the American Jewish Congress initially proposed the essential elements of the bill and praised President Eisenhower for his “unequivocal opposition to the national quota system.” In a 1956 editorial they praised him for “courageously taking a stand in advance of even many advocates of liberal immigration policy and embraced a position which had at first been urged by the American Jewish Congress and other Jewish agencies.”[877] Jewish Motivation Behind Immigration It would have been stupid and counterproductive for the Jewish organizations that pushed for open borders to admit that they were motivated by interests that conflicted with those of non-Jewish Europeans. They promoted open immigration as “patriotic.” From the early days of the century, they made public pronouncements that multiculturalism and diversity would be beneficial to the United States, cleverly masking their strategic motivations.After the passage of the open immigration statutes of 1965, Jewish authors such as Naomi W. Cohen felt much safer in revealing some of the real Jewish reasons for promoting such policies. She wrote that, beginning with the persecutions in Russia in the 1880s through the Nazi occupation of Europe and into the Cold War tribulations in Eastern Europe, open immigration in Western nations served Jewish interests because “survival often dictated that Jews seek refuge in other lands.”[878] Cohen also wrote that a U.S. internationalist foreign policy serves Jewish interests because “an internationally minded America was likely to be more sensitive to the problems of foreign Jewries”[879] Perhaps even more important, Cohen intimated that Jews saw open immigration policies as breaking down the homogeneity and unity of America, creating a pluralistic society in which Jews could thrive.In his monumental book A History of Jews in America, Howard Sachar notes that pluralism supports “legitimizing the preservation of a minority culture in the midst of a majority’s host society.”[880] So, in effect, by breaking down the integrity and cohesion of America, Jews could increase their integrity and cohesion. Sachar goes on to explicitly show how pluralism intensifies Jewish solidarity: But Kallen’s influence extended really to all educated Jews: Legitimizing the preservation of a minority culture in the midst of a majority’s host society, pluralism functioned as intellectual anchorage for an educated Jewish second generation, sustained its cohesiveness and its most tenacious communal endeavors through the rigors of the Depression and revived anti-Semitism, through the shock of Nazism and the Holocaust, until the emergence of Zionism in the post-World War II years swept through American Jewry with a climactic redemptionist fervor of its own.[881] Social psychologist Kevin MacDonald pointed out in A People That Shall Dwell Alone that major anti-Semitic movements are usually found in ethnically homogeneous nations and that “ethnic and religious pluralism serves external Jewish interests because Jews become just one of many ethnic groups… and it becomes difficult or impossible to develop unified, cohesive groups of Gentiles united in their opposition of Judaism.”[882] [883] In his 1985 book A Certain People: American Jews and Their Lives Today, Charles Silberman writes that American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief, one firmly rooted in history, that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse “gay rights” and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called “social issues.” [884] John Higham, in his book Send These to Me: Immigrants in Urban America, states in clear terms that Jewish-sponsored changes in immigration law were a defeat of the political and cultural representation of “the common people of the South and West.”[885] During the decades leading up to opening the borders in 1965, Jewish groups had piously stated that there should be no discrimination against any group in immigration and that such could only be good for America. But, Richard Arens, staff director of the Senate subcommittee that produced the Walter-McCarran Act, pointed out that the same Jewish forces which were the most avid promoters of open immigration, hypocritically opposed ethnic immigration they deemed unfavorable to their own interests. One of the curious things about those who most loudly claim that the 1952 act is “discriminatory” and that it does not make allowance for a sufficient number of alleged refugees, is that they oppose admission of any of the approximately one million Arab refugees in camps where they are living in pitiful circumstances after having been driven out of Israel.[886] Organized Jewry not only wants to prevent Arab refugees from returning to their homes in Israel, they also oppose their coming to the United States. Do they see the displaced Palestinians as potential political opponents? Jewish groups clearly promote forms of multiculturalism that destroy Gentile cohesion, but not those which could threaten their own group power. So clearly, their dedication to multiculturalism is purely a strategic one; they want groups coming into the nation which can further pluralize American society and destroy its cohesion, but not those groups whom they see as political threat. Jewish-dominated political and media institutions have long promoted the demographic invasion and dissolution of America. While the Jewish media demonize as “racists” those who oppose the flood of non-White immigration into America, Canada and all the European nations, Israel’s immigration policy that excludes non-Jews is condoned. A million Palestinians fled their homes in the wake of the Israeli blitzkrieg takeover of Palestine. They cannot return to their ancestral homeland, and many are forced to live in refugee camps that are little more than concentration camps of want and squalor. A. M. Rosenthal is the long-time editor of perhaps the most influential newspaper in America, the Jewish-owned New York Times. A hawkish supporter of Israel, he only complains about the Zionist state when it is not Zionist enough for his taste. Yet, in a 1992 editorial Rosenthal feels obligated to criticize another country which desires to preserve its racial integrity and cultural heritage: They would do better to set a quota on immigrants and nurture a more pluralist society by adopting a formula for citizenship based on residence than blood ties. Equally distressing is Bonn’s failure to revise an outdated naturalization law rooted in ethnicity. Under the existing system, a Turkish guest worker who has lived in Germany for 30 years and speaks German fluently is denied the citizenship automatically granted a Russian-speaking immigrant who can prove German ancestry. [887] Rosenthal likens current German immigration policies to that of the Nazis. Yet, is Israeli immigration law so different? Not only Germany, but every White nation is a target of Rosenthal’s open immigration advocacy. Only Israel’s immigration policy — the most draconian of all — is immune from criticism. In America, Rosenthal identifies himself as the offspring of an illegal immigrant (his father) and even lauds the immigration of Haitians, many of whom are drug users and HIV-positive. Almost always now, when I read about Haitians who risk the seas to get to this country but wind up behind barbed wire, I think of an illegal immigrant I happen to know myself, and of his daughters and his son [himself]…. Even reluctantly recognizing some economic limitations, this country should have the moral elegance to accept neighbors who flee countries where their life is terror and hunger, and are run by murderous gangs…. If that were a qualification for entry into our Golden land, the Haitians should be welcomed with song, embrace and memories.[888] As a chronic reader of The New York Times, I have yet to read a Rosenthal editorial calling for the acceptance into Israel of the million or more Palestinians who are forced by Israel to live in the dire poverty of the refugee camps. Nor has Rosenthal ever called upon Jews to welcome Palestinian refugees into Israel with “song and embrace.” Rosenthal is not stupid, but he is profoundly hypocritical. He knows that making full citizens of all the Palestinians currently in Israel and all those in refugee camps outside its borders would quickly sweep away the Zionist political state in the same way that non-European immigration erodes the America of our forefathers. On the other side of the coin, Rosenthal knows that Israel could not have been created but for their emigration-invasion of Palestine. Looking at the historical record, should Palestinians have welcomed the Jewish immigrants with song and embrace? Rosenthal has no more regard for traditional Americans anymore than he has for the original Palestinian inhabitants of what is now called Israel. He has only one overwhelming concern: Jewish Supreamcism. Rosenthal is proud of what he and many other Jews are: aliens as much as the wetbacks with whom he identifies. He lives here, partaking of all the advantages of American citizenship, but he will not — and cannot — become a real American who places the interests of America above those of the Zionist agenda. As the Jews become more brazen in their exercise of power, some now boast of their role in dispossessing the European-Gentile American. Earl Raab, executive director emeritus of the Perlmutter Institute of Jewish Advocacy, an associate of the ADL (Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith) and writer for the San Francisco Jewish Bulletin, wrote: It was only after World War II that immigration law was drastically changed to eliminate such discrimination. In one of the first pieces of evidence of its political coming-of-age, the Jewish community has a leadership role in effecting those changes.[889] Raab goes on to celebrate the coming minority status of Whites in America. Once that has happened, he looks forward to “constitutional constraints” (restriction of freedom of speech?): The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever. [890] As Raab says, Zionist Jewish activists who have supported an exclusively Jewish-run national state have been nourishing massive nontraditional immigration into America, and they look forward to the time when the voting demographics of the United States reflect that transformation. I wonder if Zionist Israel Zangwill — who coined the term “melting pot” — envisioned his Jewish state as a melting pot of Jew and Arab; of Islam and Judaism. Given the ethnocentrism of Zionism, I rather doubt it. One American cartoonist wrote that the problem with a melting pot is that “The bottom always gets burned, and the scum rises to the top.” It is true that America has seen a melting of the different nationalities of Europe into a traditional American majority, but in spite of the pervasive race-mixing propaganda of the Jewish media, there has been no great melting of the White and Black, and only marginal melting of the Mestizo and Anglo elements. However, what these Zionists have not yet been able to accomplish through their advocacy of miscegenation, they are in the process of achieving through massive immigration and differential birthrates. Jews have also promoted, through “zero-population” advocates such as Paul Ehrlich, smaller families among the natural leaders of the American majority. Jewish promotion of the women’s liberation movement and abortion on demand has lowered the birthrate of America’s most productive and educated classes. Their blunt desire is the dissolution of the European race in the West by any means necessary. Continued massive non-European immigration satisfies these aims. In summary, massive non-White immigration has been one of the most effective weapons of organized Jewry in its cultural and ethnic war against the European American. We cannot win this life and death struggle until our people realize that we are in the midst of a war — and our side is suffering great losses. To lose this war would mean the destruction of our American culture, heritage, and freedoms. It would mean nothing less than the destruction of the very genes that have made possible all the social, cultural and spiritual creations that distinguish our civilization. Our voices are muted by mass media that are in the hands of our enemies. Too many of us are silently witnessing the genocide of our people. The time is late. We must speak out now and defend ourselves. We must fight for the continuation of the magnificent culture bequeathed to us by our forefathers. We must take whatever action necessary to insure the future of our children and our generations to come. As is true for all living things, we must fight for our right to live. America is in many ways already occupied similarly to the Israeli occupation of Palestine. Jewish Supremacists control the news, publishing and entertainment media, they control our elections and politicians, and now they are orchestrating a massive immigration into our land that will make us a politically and culturally impotent minority in the same way that the people of Palestine have suffered that fate. They seek to make our country into a tower of Babel in which they will occupy the top floors. Not only are Americans on the road to oblivion from immigration, but so are our brethren across Europe. Indeed, many nations are under the Jewish Supremacist drive toward globalization, and the destruction of any sort of ethnic or national pride and cohesiveness that could pose a threat to their hegemony. They seek to remake the world into an unremarkable mass of atomistic, deracinated individuals incapable of collective resistance. If we remain silent in this critical time in our people’s history, our people will be extinguished and silent forever. This maxim is not only true for Europeans and Americans, but for all the peoples of the Earth. References 869. Smith, Drew L. (1971). The Legacy Of The Melting Pot. North Quincy, Massachusetts. Christopher Publishing House 870. Congressional Record, April 12, 1924. 6,265-6,266. 871. Ross, E. A. (1914). The Old World And The New: The Significance Of Past And Present Immigration To The American People. New York: The Century Co. p.144.. 872. Congressional Record, April 12, 1924. 6,272. 873. Congressional Record, April 23, 1952. 2,285. 874. Joint Hearings Before The Subcommittees Of The Committees On The Judiciary, 82nd Congress, First Session, On S. 716, H. R. 2379, And H. R. 2816. March 6April 9, 1951. 563 875. Congressional Record, April 23, 1952. 4,320. 876. Javits, J (1951) Let’s Open Our Gates New York Times Magazine July 8. p.8, 33. 877. Congress Weekly. (1956). Editorial of February 20. p.3 878. Cohen, N. W. (1972). Not Free To Desist: The American Jewish Committee 1906-1966. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society Of America. 879. Ibid. p.342. 880. Sachar, H. (1992). A History Of Jews In America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 881. Ibid. p.427. 882. MacDonald, K. B. (1994). A People That Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism As A Group Evolutionary Strategy. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger. 883. MacDonald, K. B. (1998). Separation And Its Discontents: Toward An Evolutionary Theory Of Anti-Semitism. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger. 884. Silberman, C. E. (1985). A Certain people: American Jews and Their Lives Today. New York: Summit Books. 885. Higham , J. (1984). Send These To Me: Immigrants In Urban America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 886. Bennett, M. T. (1963). American Immigration Policies: A History. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press. p.181. 887. A. M. Rosenthal. (1992). New York Times. December 9. 888. A. M. Rosenthal. (1992). New York Times. December 9. 889. Jewish Bulletin. (1993). July. 23. 890. Jewish Bulletin. (1993). Feb. 19. --- lawrence.auster@att.net From lawrence.auster em att.net Fri Jan 16 09:19:21 2009 From: lawrence.auster em att.net (Lawrence Auster) Date: Fri Jan 16 09:19:33 2009 Subject: [Gesac. AC] ADL =?iso-8859-1?q?B=92nai_B=92rith=27s?= New =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=91Trojan Horse=92?= Hate Bill Message-ID: <20090116111924.HTZT11982.hrndva-omta06.mail.rr.com@60xp7> ADL’s New ‘Trojan Horse’ Hate Bill 1/16/2009 By Rev. Ted Pike The Anti-Defamation League, architect of hate laws worldwide, has served up two hate bills to Congress this term. These include a condensed version of the same one that failed to pass over the past ten years, “The David Ray Hate Crimes Prevention Act.” Reintroduction of the familiar bill was no surprise, as it had been rejected five times. The big news is emergence of a different sounding hate bill, a seemingly harmless version with ostensibly humanitarian, not punitive, ambitions. This is the David Ray Ritcheson Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, H.R. 262. It is classic “Trojan horse” legislation, attempting to charm wary legislators into making America a hate crimes bureaucracy. H.R. 262 wants to establish a federal hate crime “clearinghouse” or “resource” center and database. Through a website and 24-hour hotline, it will receive hate crime complaints nationwide. “Anti-bias” pro-homosexual education will pervade every level of American schooling – from kindergarten to graduate school. It will “prevent” hate crime through an extensive curricula dedicated to eliminating those “seed ideas” which cause hate crimes, i.e., Christian disapproval of homosexuality. Such reeducation will be enforced upon students, teachers, professors, and administrators everywhere. Price tag: $10,000,000 annually. ADL at the Top Who will administer this new hate crime bureaucracy? H.R. 262 says that, although Congress will make it law, it won’t be run by the government. Instead, the bill says the government will be looking for a private non-profit organization with broad experience in hate crimes education, prevention, and statistics gathering. Where might such a high-minded, illustrious, and experienced organization be found? You guessed it. There’s only one “civil liberties” group remotely equal to that task, one which describes itself as “the world’s leading organization fighting anti-Semitism through programs and services that counteract hatred, prejudice, and bigotry,” the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith. H.R. 262 is ADL’s attempt to insert itself into the U.S. government as the nation’s hate law teacher. It already fulfills that role in law enforcement. Since passage of ADL’s Hate Crimes Statistics Act in 1980, it received federal authority to teach hate crimes theory, enforcement, and statistics gathering to the U.S. Justice Department, FBI, and police clear down to the local precinct. ADL is not only PR representative for Israel but is the adjunct of a Jewish religious organization, B’nai B’rith International. ADL loudly protests Christian mixing of religion with politics, but no one compares to ADL’s mixing of synagogue with state! If ADL can’t pass the familiar hate bill, establishing power of the federal government to punish hate crimes in the states, it hopes to pass its second bill, endowing itself with unlimited powers to educate us and our children out of the “mental illness” of “homophobia.” Through the decades, ADL made it abundantly clear that it considers bias against homosexuality rooted in biblical “hate speech” as the underlying cause of hate crimes against homosexuals. Christian-Persecuting State Hate Laws “But,” you may ask, “What good is education against hate crimes unless there is government power to enforce it?” Actually, ADL already has persuaded 45 U.S. states to pass versions of its model anti-hate law. These potentially Christian-persecuting hate laws were set up since 1990 to make sure that even if it fails to pass a federal hate bill ADL will still have local empowerment to persecute Christians. Such diversified enforcement is far inferior to massive federal enforcement, yet, clearly, ADL, after ten years of failing to obtain a federal law, may be ready to settle for second best. Control of federal hate crime education nationwide with at least 45 states locked into laws inclined to criminalize Christian “haters” means tremendous advancement of ADL’s goal to end freedom - just as ADL ended freedom in Canada under its similar hate law in 1971. For the past 30 years, ADL has had to ask state governments, school districts, city councils, civic organizations, etc., for permission to educate their members. ADL initiatives have included its “No Place for Hate,” “World of Difference,” and now cyber-bullying, anti-homophobia programs. If H.R. 262 is passed, ADL will enjoy federal authority to teach anti-Christian values on all levels of U.S. education. Educators, parents, or students will have to take it or become federal criminals! In 2008, Gov. Schwarzenegger passed liberal Jewish activist Sheila Kuhl’s anti-Christian bill S.B.777, making it illegal to criticize homosexuality in California public schools. If H.R. 262 is passed, a tidal wave of federal suppression of Christian values will flood every classroom in America. Homosexuals: New Welfare Class S.B. 262 contains other unprecedented pro-homosexual initiatives. Although the 14th Amendment to the Constitution forbids special rights, privileges, or services to preferred groups, S.B. 262 defies this giving special federal assistance to alleged victims of hate crimes. These include unemployment compensation, leave from work, temporary housing, free legal help and advocacy as well as psychological counseling. It will also forbid life and health insurance companies from “discriminating” against alleged hate crimes victims once they learn such persons are homosexuals. Obviously, if a life insurance company knows that an applicant is a homosexual, part of a class with a much lower average life expectancy due to AIDS, it might be reluctant to insure. This legislation forbids such insurers or health insurance companies from treating them differently than the rest of the population. Who proves that an alleged hate victim is really a victim and not just scamming the government? Will a court verdict, following trial by a judge and/or jury, be required? Absolutely not. If that were the criterion, then only the tiniest number of hate crimes victims could file for compensation. Only a small percentage of the alleged 7,500 alleged hate crimes in America are proven as fact in court of law. The rest are “hate crimes incidents” – taunts, fisticuffs, verbal “intimidation,” etc. which are judged by the local police as “hate crimes” but have never seen a courtroom. Instead, S.B. 262 says the opinion of the prosecuting attorney is sufficient to establish the plaintiff as a bona fide hate crime victim. Such a declaration may be given by the DA just as soon as he decides to prosecute the “hate criminal.” If the alleged victim claims he has been unable to work because of “emotional stress,” he is then eligible for immediate federal benefits and unemployment compensation even though his case may be never go through the court. The government will also provide benefits to his civil union “spouse,” sons, daughters, or parents! This means that all a homosexual has to do is scream, “Hate crime!” convincingly enough, persuading the local DA to prosecute his adversary. He may then start receiving many forms of federal assistance. Victims of the same crimes, not motivated by bias, can only look on with envy. It takes little imagination to envision a new welfare class of predominantly homosexual hate crimes “victims,” created by S.B. 262. Will Congress buy it? Rep. Jackson-Lee’s legislative expert told me the creators of S.B. 262 are optimistic that its soft-sell, compassionate approach will persuade Congress to pass it. He’s probably right, especially if Christian/conservative watchdog groups are not courageous or innovative enough to fight it. Of one thing we may be sure: No Christian/conservative leader will breathe a word of how ADL has created or will benefit from this frightening legislation. Since ADL is Jewish, they will continue to lie to their constituencies, spreading the fantasy that hate laws are the brainchild of the “homosexual lobby.” That leaves it to you and me to expose and battle down S.B. 262. The best way to accomplish that is to do what has worked so well before: repeatedly bombard Congress with communications. Call toll-free 1-877-851-6437 or toll 1-202-225-3121. Here’s our own new double-barreled message: “Please vote against both hate crimes bills, H.R. 256 and H.R. 262. Hate laws have taken away free speech in Canada and many European countries.” Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization. TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this topic. Call (503) 631-3808. Read more Ted Pike at www.TruthTellers.org From akosuaalford em listas.idbrasil.org.br Fri Jan 16 11:37:55 2009 From: akosuaalford em listas.idbrasil.org.br (Akosua Alford) Date: Fri Jan 16 11:38:24 2009 Subject: [Gesac. AC] Diamond [Ticket ID Fiesta] 555 now, it is real Mist Message-ID: <000f01c977df$a25dabf0$2f8a0e3c@akosuataras> Shalom. Looking for the greatest gaming hot spots? Wonder where casino lovers go when they're looking for the hottest games around? Look no further - Fiesta Club Casino.